The following review of BoingBoing TV isn’t an entirely positive one. But in the interest of full disclosure, it’s only fair to mention that

1. I’m not nuts about online news shows in the first place,
2. as a commenter below pointed out, it’s the first episode — give ‘em time to develop, and
   
3. I am probably just mad that I’m not doing something similar myself.

BoingBoing TV’s not necessarily bad. Not bad like the idea for the BoingBoing reality show, as mentioned in the LA Times article about BB’s new venture. Christ, that would have sucked. A reality show about four people who, by definition, spend a lot of time staring at a glowing screen? And an “American Idol”-style show (also mentioned in the Times article) would have sucked worse. Each round would be 30 seconds long with hundreds of people auditioning. Call it what you want, but four uber-nerds approving posts is never going to make for action-packed TV.

BoingBoing TV’s not bad at all … it’s just really not that good, either. It just doesn’t do anything special for me. At least Rocketboom’s got the pretty lady with the hot hot accent, but I’m not nuts about that show, either.

I love the Web because I don’t get my news spoonfed to me in tidy, advertiser-friendly gulps. Sure, blogs are clotted with advertising and PR spin, but by clicking and jumping around, I can get a bunch of different input and make up my own mind.

I love BoingBoing for being a resource for Web weirdness in tiny, separable chunks. I don’t mind a day where only one post works for me and the rest are crap. But a TV show — even a five-minute one — with only one good story is a lame show. Rocketboom has the same problems. It’s linear. You have to sit through the boring stuff, even if it’s only 15 seconds long.

Ever try talking to a garden shrew about something that’s not edible? That’s my attention span after a career spent online. Fifteen seconds of boring is fourteen too many.

Read the rest of this entry »